AD, that looks fine. Not that I would know, though.
Caution: this is coming from someone who has no experience. So a grain of salt.
I just ordered this Manfrotto fluid head myself. So it's definitely a case of someone suggesting, or really just mentioning, the gear that
he himself bought, which doesn't necessarily mean objectivity or familiarity. But it's one of those heads that's out there, gets attention, and seems to have quite a bit of positive regard. But it's not all positive; some find at least minor disappointments with it. But also, a while back Jax Rox said it's a decent head, which of course I liked to hear before buying it.
I don't know if anyone's selling it as part of a package with legs, though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1i4MskxyZ3M
Nikki, the same grain of salt caution for you too. But I'll give it a try.
I suppose it might depend on just what the average height of a person is that you're thinking of. They grows 'em tall these days.
When I was searching for answers to help me figure out what tripod to get, one of the suggestions I read was that it's best to get your height from the tripod's legs, not by resorting to raising its center column, if it has a center column. But I was focusing on finding a tripod for still photography at the time. Does that apply to tripods for video?
Anyway, running with that idea, I guess the idea is that the center column is less stable. So, that might lead you to suggestions that you get something like a Really Right Stuff tripod. Very drool worthy gear. But them babies are expensive. And are they the sort of tripods videographers want? Maybe videographers want a different sort of animal?
Though, these sure look glorious:
RRS Blog
I'll stop mumbling on in my ignorance now.
For what it's worth, I decided on a nice, more affordable Manfrotto tripod, which seems to be of really nice quality, despite not being Really Right Stuff (or some such).