Let's say you have two characters sitting at opposite sides of the table facing each other. You want to experiment with the scene and do a lot of takes; a couple sticking to script, then a couple with minor alterations for variety, then a couple where you let the actors just do whatever they want. The first shot you do is the master - but you need additional coverage for a Mid-shot and close up shot of both players.
Is the best strategy to do all the takes in master shot first, then from the six or so takes you filmed pick the one you liked best then get the players to repeat for the closer shots?
What if the take you liked was one where the actors improvised, it may be difficult to get the performance exactly as it was in the Mid & Close shots - do you just take what you get in the additional coverage and hope it fits with the master you liked, or do you also pick your second favourite take (perhaps one without improv) then do the mid & close shots for that as a backup?
Another strategy would be to do a master shot first, then whenever you get a take you like you go in for the closer shots while it is still fresh in the actors mind.
I'd like to hear how other people handle it.
Is the best strategy to do all the takes in master shot first, then from the six or so takes you filmed pick the one you liked best then get the players to repeat for the closer shots?
What if the take you liked was one where the actors improvised, it may be difficult to get the performance exactly as it was in the Mid & Close shots - do you just take what you get in the additional coverage and hope it fits with the master you liked, or do you also pick your second favourite take (perhaps one without improv) then do the mid & close shots for that as a backup?
Another strategy would be to do a master shot first, then whenever you get a take you like you go in for the closer shots while it is still fresh in the actors mind.
I'd like to hear how other people handle it.