Hello All,
I am writing a story that is driven by anti-heroes. A friend told me that the "anti-heroes journey" is different than the "heroes journey". My first question, I am wondering if any of you have a chart diagram on how the anti-hero develops in a screenplay.
Also, I am needing some general feedback on one of my characters.
The movie is about the two characters and how they are disdainful of an institution... they both want to take action, but one takes it much too far - and forces the other "protagonist" to join him in violence. He starts out being resistant to the psychopathic antagonist, trying to stop his psychopathic plans. But, midway through the second act, the protagonist develops some sort of Stockholm syndrome and joins the antagonist in his plans. (until the end where he snaps out of it - and remembers what is right).
I am concerned about the structure - although it is interesting, I am wondering if I am breaking some sort of rule. Is it possible that your protagonist can join your antagonist mid way through the movie.. and maybe, some other character takes on the original motivation that the protagonist had to begin with? A movie that comes to mind with this kind of structure is Karate Kid 3... When Daniel becomes an a**hole, and steals mr miagi's tree, and turns towards "the dark side", until he is brought back to reality when he reaches his lowest point. I know that it is possible to do this kind of structure, but what worries me is the fact that I hated Karate kid 3.
Any feedback would be great!
Thanks,
PWR
I am writing a story that is driven by anti-heroes. A friend told me that the "anti-heroes journey" is different than the "heroes journey". My first question, I am wondering if any of you have a chart diagram on how the anti-hero develops in a screenplay.
Also, I am needing some general feedback on one of my characters.
The movie is about the two characters and how they are disdainful of an institution... they both want to take action, but one takes it much too far - and forces the other "protagonist" to join him in violence. He starts out being resistant to the psychopathic antagonist, trying to stop his psychopathic plans. But, midway through the second act, the protagonist develops some sort of Stockholm syndrome and joins the antagonist in his plans. (until the end where he snaps out of it - and remembers what is right).
I am concerned about the structure - although it is interesting, I am wondering if I am breaking some sort of rule. Is it possible that your protagonist can join your antagonist mid way through the movie.. and maybe, some other character takes on the original motivation that the protagonist had to begin with? A movie that comes to mind with this kind of structure is Karate Kid 3... When Daniel becomes an a**hole, and steals mr miagi's tree, and turns towards "the dark side", until he is brought back to reality when he reaches his lowest point. I know that it is possible to do this kind of structure, but what worries me is the fact that I hated Karate kid 3.

Any feedback would be great!
Thanks,
PWR