With the change in technology, I no longer believe the best editing setup is a CRT TV and computer monitor for editing.
I presently have an HD monitor with my desktop. The video card can support a second monitor. The video card also supports 3D HD and my Blu-ray burner drive supports 3D Blu-ray as does the latest version of the Nero Suite that I have (Version 12). Windows 8 is designed for a touch screen environment.
Would it be to my advantage to get aa 3D HD monitor with a HDMI connection as my second monitor? Or, should I get a touch screen monitor to replace the original monitor and add the 3D HD monitor later? I cannot afford to buy both. They are expensive. I am hoping to buy on or the other before the year is out. If I go for a touch screen, I would move over the HD monitor as the second monitor until I could afford the 3D monitor.
I am thinking about the future of media in film too. Although, 3D Blu-ray may fissile out because the sales are not what TV manufacturers were hoping for.
I presently have an HD monitor with my desktop. The video card can support a second monitor. The video card also supports 3D HD and my Blu-ray burner drive supports 3D Blu-ray as does the latest version of the Nero Suite that I have (Version 12). Windows 8 is designed for a touch screen environment.
Would it be to my advantage to get aa 3D HD monitor with a HDMI connection as my second monitor? Or, should I get a touch screen monitor to replace the original monitor and add the 3D HD monitor later? I cannot afford to buy both. They are expensive. I am hoping to buy on or the other before the year is out. If I go for a touch screen, I would move over the HD monitor as the second monitor until I could afford the 3D monitor.
I am thinking about the future of media in film too. Although, 3D Blu-ray may fissile out because the sales are not what TV manufacturers were hoping for.