Did you guys know [URL="http://www.cbc.ca/cp/media/070108/X01089AU.html]ACTRA is on strike[/URL] in Canada right now (like 8 provinces or something) because they want to get paid for media that goes on the internet? It's crazy.
A lot of the bigger productions just signed deals to avoid the strike, so really, it's the little guys like us who get hurt by these union-type deals. I know background (extra) actors gets paid something like $19/hour plus triple over time if they're in ACTRA, while I would make a measly $9 and time and a half doing the same job. And considering most of the ACTRA actors I know just bought their way in through commercials (acting?) that offered credits over pay, it just feels like a scam. And now the little indie productions shooting with union actors are screwed.
Actra is saying they want more royalties from online and new media, but at the same time trying to get a 7% increase in salaries each year (from like, 5%)! As what some could call a "starving actor", I am appalled at the greediness of the union. These people are supposed to protect the interests of actors, but really, it just limits the actor's ability to work. A friend of mine was in one of our movies, and he's an ACTRA apprentice. After we shot, he told me he was worried because he didn't know how ACTRA was going to accept being in a non-union short. He "got away with it" because he wasn't a full-fledged member, but it shows how ACTRA went from Big Brother in the helping sense, to the Orwellian.
What are your guy's thoughts on these unions (SAG, ACTRA)?
Hoe much money do actors need? Why strike when it only really affects small productions (since the big ones just make deals)? How long can a filmmaker avoid the unions?
A lot of the bigger productions just signed deals to avoid the strike, so really, it's the little guys like us who get hurt by these union-type deals. I know background (extra) actors gets paid something like $19/hour plus triple over time if they're in ACTRA, while I would make a measly $9 and time and a half doing the same job. And considering most of the ACTRA actors I know just bought their way in through commercials (acting?) that offered credits over pay, it just feels like a scam. And now the little indie productions shooting with union actors are screwed.
Actra is saying they want more royalties from online and new media, but at the same time trying to get a 7% increase in salaries each year (from like, 5%)! As what some could call a "starving actor", I am appalled at the greediness of the union. These people are supposed to protect the interests of actors, but really, it just limits the actor's ability to work. A friend of mine was in one of our movies, and he's an ACTRA apprentice. After we shot, he told me he was worried because he didn't know how ACTRA was going to accept being in a non-union short. He "got away with it" because he wasn't a full-fledged member, but it shows how ACTRA went from Big Brother in the helping sense, to the Orwellian.
What are your guy's thoughts on these unions (SAG, ACTRA)?
Hoe much money do actors need? Why strike when it only really affects small productions (since the big ones just make deals)? How long can a filmmaker avoid the unions?