Need tips for capturing solid audio in extreme conditions

Calling Alcove, APE, and all you other sound gurus out there!

Mind taking a peek at what I am up to, and jotting down some of your thoughts?

http://www.indietalk.com/showthread.php?p=330662#post330662

I could probably join and post on a more audio-centric site, and will be doing google research while we drive to our start point. Still, you guys and the other folks here knock it out of the park on these things. :yes:

TIA.
 
The simple answer is - hire a professional and let him/her solve the problem.

The other answer is to spend a lot of money renting the right gear - if any of the rental houses have the right gear. Or you could spend huge gobs of money buying the right gear to handle the environmental and situational problems, taking a few weeks learning how to use it properly and hoping for the best, because it takes years of experiences to learn how to get solid production sound in such extreme situations.

So I would recommend Jeff Wexler's site for film sound professionals:

http://jwsoundgroup.net/
 
The simple answer is - hire a professional and let him/her solve the problem.

You don't say? I am an 11th hour replacement hire for their previous cameraman who sustained an injury on another job. The firstquestion I asked (quite literally) was if there was a sound person. If they had answered yes, I would not have written this post.


The other answer is to spend a lot of money renting the right gear - if any of the rental houses have the right gear. Or you could spend huge gobs of money buying the right gear to handle the environmental and situational problems, taking a few weeks learning how to use it properly and hoping for the best, because it takes years of experiences to learn how to get solid production sound in such extreme situations.

Gear package is fixed, see above. I'm sorry if I was not clear, but this was not a pre-production question. This was a "what can I do while I am out there to make the best of a sub-optimal situation" question. None of the gear is of the build quality that I would prefer, but we are working with lavs (sony's) at least 1 boom (I want to say NTG series) and standard on-camera cheapos for the DSLRs to give us scratch tracks. Naturally, when the underwater housing is in play, no scratch track, but them's the breaks and we're not using that for sync sound shots anyway.

So I would recommend Jeff Wexler's site for film sound professionals:

http://jwsoundgroup.net/

Well thank you for that, at least. I'll try to read through that on our way to the drop.


---

Look, that response makes me almost sorry I asked. I know that after answering the same questions a ga-jillion times (because this site, as awesome as it is, is sorely in need of a new sticky policy) you're tired of trying to get people to "do it right."

Believe me. I have a short list of production recordists that I would call up in an instant if I thought I could talk the producers into bringing one, and you can bet your studio investment that if I am asked back for another season I am going to push to add a sound man to the team as hard as I can without them firing me in an absolute rage over the repetition of the question. :lol:

So, you'll pardon me if I am a little turned off at being responded to like every newbie who comes along with their first post and thinks they can make the "next big thing" with the on-camera mic of their DSLR. The link is quite valuable and should give me something to work with. Thank you for sharing it. We could have skipped the statement of the obvious in this thread, in my opinion, and just stuck to practical information. For example, I feel like I have heard that condoms are sometimes used to protect mics. Am I confusing this with something else, or is that something people do. If so why and when would I want to use that technique.

Obviously nothing will replace years of experience and the investment in the proper gear, but those are things I don't get to have this time out. The overwhelming majority of the time I am either shooting in a controlled environment where the parameters for getting good sound are so fundamentally basic that it's a non-issue, OR I am working on a show where there is an experienced recordist working the show and I don't have to think about it beyond making sure sync (whatever method) is happening with the camera and that the boom is out of the shot. This is one of those very rare instances where I have a sub-optimal gear package for audio, but at least the basics, and I have to do the best I can with what I have and on my own.

I kinda, mostly, apologize for tee-ing off on you a little. I'm more than marginally professionally terrified at the moment, and have not yet had time to process the reality of the tangible, physical danger of this undertaking. So, to say I am a little stressed would rank among some of the all time great understatements. That said, I do think a lot of that was pretty unnecessary.
 
Last edited:
What's the inventory of the audio equipment provided for you to work with?
And what does the previous DP/Audio guy have to contribute?

Presumably since this is season 3 the equipment has been both vetted and is somewhat... weathered, good or bad.
 
Sticking specifically to sound stuff:

Lavs are new Sony's, iirc their g3 competitor, probably cheaper and lower quality.
Boom is new, boom pole is ancient, no stands. NTG series, did not write down the #.
5D in the underwater housing won't wear a mic, but it will wear a VMP or similar for a scratch track when not in the housing.
XF105/100 (primary and backup) have XLR in's and will also serve as our external recorder for the 5D as needed.
All the other cameras are not necessarily sync critical, and if they are it is because something "unmissable" is happening and when that is the case the most important thing is capturing it.
We have a small collection of accessories, dead cat, etc.

I haven't spoken with the previous shooter, but I do know that they had tremendous hurdles with sound on both prior seasons. To give you an idea, when I was going over the gear the other day they made a point to show off the dead cat, "And we have one of these this year!" And they were not even going as far as to do a hand-clap at the start of a 2-cam interview on those runs either.

:lol:

In my perfect world, everyone would be wearing lectros (or whatever the sound guy though best) at all times, we'd have lockit boxes on all the cameras (and be using probably c300s in place of the 5Ds to give us time code), and one of my short list people would be running audio.

So much for perfect! ;)

-----

Here's a specific question. Is it even possible to effectively lav mic someone who is wearing a dry suit?
 
To give you an idea, when I was going over the gear the other day they made a point to show off the dead cat, "And we have one of these this year!"...
:hmm:

Even IF you did have a shopping list I suspect there isn't much a budget for it if a dead cat is a "Oo-Ah!" event.

Think you could swing tagging on another sponsor of some wind, water and weather resistant audio gear?

I just swiped these names from another site:
"Use Counrtyman EMW lavs and Lectrosonics MM400 transmitter and UCR400 receiver.

Cantar recorder is waterproof.

Zaxcom makes a wireless transmitter that has IFB and a built in recorder via SD card also with timecode. http://www.zaxcom.com/transmitters.htm
With the IFB part you could also put a earphone in the kayaker's helmet so you can talk to him as well. I wouldn't put a recorder in the boat too great a possibility of losing it.

I have seen sound guys use condoms to wrap mics in wet conditions and they are thin enough to allow sound waves to come thru. Obviously use the non-lube kind.

The Countryman B6 is also a good waterproof solution when teamed with the Lectro."


(This looks like consumer cr@p, but I found it:
http://www.amazon.com/Portable-Recorder-Waterproof-Function-Riding/dp/B00AF5ST5I )


GL! :lol:
 
David, I know Alcove's reply might have sounded like a stock flippant answer but really it wasn't. You are talking about environments which will likely be wet, windy and arctic, plus I presume you're quite frequently going to have engine noise and noise from the sea. As far as field sound recording goes, this all adds up to about as challenging as it gets. Even a top professional with all the best audio equipment would struggle (and sometimes fail) to get usable sound in some/many of the situations you are likely to encounter. So, what can we say that will help a relatively inexperienced audio guy without the best audio equipment?

Beyond the obvious of getting the mic in close, using a dead cat, etc., each situation you encounter will have it's own best option (I won't say "solution" because there will not be a solution in some cases), it's a case of trying every different mic, mic placement/position you can think of until you get usable sound. The advantage of a top pro is their years of experience, which will hugely narrow down what is most likely to get the best results in each individual situation and to not bother wasting time in those situations where usable sound is just not feasible.

The best advice I can give, is to convince your producer to play as smart as possible (if they won't do the smart thing and hire a pro in the first place!). A fairly high percentage of the time you are filming, getting usable sound will not be a realistic goal, just do the best you can. Without a pro or a range of top equipment, the director/producer should already be planning on using a lot of narration/VO's but, when the sea is calm, when there's no rain, the wind has completely died and the environment is as good as it's going to get, then they should plan to devote as much time as possible to concentrating on the production sound, so at least they've got a certain amount of usable location sound. Another useful tip is to record as many/much background sounds as possible, both on location (conditions permitting) and before you depart. Ideally you would capture several minutes of usable background and wildlife sound for each location, as well as build a sound library of jet-ski's starting up, stopping, drive by's, singly and in a group, mono and stereo, close, medium and far, approaching, departing, taking to the air, hitting waves, etc, etc, etc. Waves lapping against the jet-ski's and against the shore, big waves, small waves, fast, slow, etc. Footsteps (individuals and groups) on beaches, sand, rocks, pebbles, clothes and baggage handling (the more the better!), you get the idea.

BTW, the condom trick is really a bit of a last resort, it does reduce the response of the mic but a reduced response mic is lot better than a no response mic due to water damage! How much a condom will reduce the mic's response depends on the strength and frequency content of sound source, the mic, the environmental conditions and the condom itself (try to get the very thinnest "feather lite" possible).

I can't really help with your dry suit problem, I would need to see the suit, helmet, goggles or whatever else was being worn and hear the environmental conditions and sound problems you are trying to avoid, in other words, I'd really need to be there. Maybe a lav taped to the side of the face not facing the camera, maybe hidden in the hairline, goggles or neck area of the suit. Without knowing the exact situation all I can offer are the same simple ideas you have probably already thought of. I'm in audio post rather than production sound, so I'm intimately familiar with the results of production sound teams but I'm not usually privvy to exactly what they did to overcome (or not) the situations/environments they had to deal with. On the JWSound website there are quite a few very experienced production sound pros who can provide way more advice than me but I suspect they too will be limited to generalisations, due to not knowing the specifics of your locations and due to your limited experience, equipment and production sound budget.

G
 
Last edited:
I know you got that clock ticking, nay, pounding away, and on top of likely little to no budget for additional gear ("Because that dead cat is the cat's pajamas radical!" -sigh-) but maybe during layovers and downtime you can hunt down info about motorcycle helmet microphone systems and maybe some waterproof mic systems designed for snow boarding and jet skiers.

If budget permits have a package delivered to your nest port of call.

You might not start the season with all the tools you need, but that doesn't mean you can't get care packages along the way. :)
 
APE beat me to the punch.

The devil is in the details, and there were no details in either of your original posts. I still haven't seen a comprehensive audio equipment list, even in your subsequent posts. The question, in essence, was "how do I get good production sound in an impossible environmental and logistical shooting situation." The answer is "Retain someone who, at the least, has a clue as about how to approach the situation."

Your real situation as detailed in your later posts comes down to "I have to record audio of extreme situations, in an extreme environment, while sitting on the back of an extreme vehicle - without any assistance, without any equipment, without any budget and without any knowledge, skills or experience. Oh, I'll be doing three other jobs at the same time." What kind of answer did you expect?

Even though I do have a bit of audio knowledge I would not take this gig under the circumstances you have described, even if I was doing production sound and only production sound. It is beyond my experience. (Besides, I can't stand cold weather!)

Your client has unrealistic expectations. The job they have asked you to do is akin to asking the participants to drive their jet-skis while cooking dinner and playing the piano at the same time.

From your original post on the other thread:


I get to concentrating on shooting

Managing/sorting data is going to be one of the biggest challenges in a production sense - second only to getting good sound... ...they had problems with this in season 2.

So their solution to the problems with Season 2 is to buy a dead cat? They will make zero effort and zero additions to the budget to improve the audio issues? If they don't give a damn why should you?

we have lav mics,

Are they wired or wireless? To what is their signal being directed for capture?



I won't go through the rest of your posts step by step, because it's pointless. You want to acquire the skills, knowledge and experience of a 20 year production sound professional in less than 24 hours, and you still won't have the equipment to do the job correctly. And how much attention will you be able to pay to the sound while holding onto the camera in one hand and holding onto a jet-ski for your life with the other hand? APE had a lot of good suggestions - capturing ambient sounds and specific sounds to build a library - but I will make the prediction that your client probably will not allow you the time to do so, even if you have the gear to do it at all.

I'm sorry to be so negative, but I deal with this all the time, and the annoyance factor grows with every single occurrence. I've just had a week of "Why is your bill so high?" The answer he gets is "Because you didn't hire a qualified production sound crew like I told you to in the first place!" "But he wanted $150 a day!" " That's cheaper than what you (haven't yet) paid me to clean it up, isn't it?"

Moron.

Last Friday I had a guy complaining that I couldn't fix the sound of a wide shot - which was captured using the DSLR mic from 40 feet. I referred him to a buddy of mine, who told him that he could make the audio understandable, but it would not be "broadcast quality" - and it would take a minimum of 20 hours at $385 per hour. (The only reason it was at all possible to make the audio understandable is that the two people are indoors and are screaming at each other.)

So, my apologies. Do the best you can with what you have, whatever it is.

Good Luck!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
David, I know Alcove's reply might have sounded like a stock flippant answer but really it wasn't.

As much as I really don't want to derail this thread, I do want to explain myself a little more fully, because with all due respect to you both I disagree: it was a stock, and (imo) slightly disrespectful answer.

An answer that was given without any consideration for the amount of time I have been a member here, my growth as a freelancer in that period of time, my numerous posts backing up Alcove when he tells true newbies to invest in gear, or when he tells people with a modest budget to hire someone, my other numerous posts skipping that part and just quoting one of his posts from a similar thread, and the - I feel - amount of information I have provided given what I have learned over the last 5 years working my way up the camera department ladder. Am I some 20 year vet? Certainly not, though I do have a lifetime of photographic experience it is only in the last 10 years or so that I have been in control of myself and my personality even remotely enough to take a stab at this, or frankly any career. Can you tell that I still struggle with that? ;)

At the very least, I would think that my participation here has shown that I have enough experience that we should be able to skip over the obvious, stock answers.

I almost never ask questions on this board anymore, and I certainly almost never start an entirely new thread to ask a question. Please understand that I have a tremendous amount of respect for both of your experience certainly for the craft of the sound department. 20 years ago I spent a little time making absolutely no money doing 24-track analog studio recordings for no-name punk and industrial bands - and while that is nothing on the experience chart, it is at least enough grounding to have an understanding of the direness of the sound recording situation into which I have been thrust.

Please understand that I know why that was the first response, and that knowledge is precisely why I didn't even bother trying to ask on an audio pro specific site, because chances are it would be the same, except repeated a couple hundred times, and some of those repeats would include 1000% more rudeness.

I skipped quoting the rest of your post for brevity, but it was Gold, every word of it. Interestingly, I may have to do more wild sound than it would seem, and I hadn't thought of that yet. Thank you for offering what generalizations you could. Even just the brief thoughts about dry suits has given me some ideas.

I know you got that clock ticking, nay, pounding away, and on top of likely little to no budget for additional gear ("Because that dead cat is the cat's pajamas radical!" -sigh-) but maybe during layovers and downtime you can hunt down info about motorcycle helmet microphone systems and maybe some waterproof mic systems designed for snow boarding and jet skiers.

If budget permits have a package delivered to your nest port of call.

You might not start the season with all the tools you need, but that doesn't mean you can't get care packages along the way. :)

That is a great idea on the radios, and we do have road time to acquire some additional aks as we travel north to the drop. idk specifically how much I will be able to talk him into, but we have already discussed filling in the blanks.

APE beat me to the punch.

The devil is in the details, and there were no details in either of your original posts.

Well, I made, imo, two mistakes here. The first being my most common mistake, not explicitly stating word by word exactly what the situation was.

The second was asking any sort of advanced technique/tricks/tips/gotchas question here at all. Particularly regarding sound. This, strictly speaking, is probably not the right community for the sort of information I am lacking - and from what you've both said so far it appears that trial and error will be my best friend. I should have known it would cause beef because I'm barely the kind of person who suffers being treated as a fool in the first place, and in my current mental state I probably shouldn't be communicating with anyone - especially in a space where tone/body language and the rest are completely absent. Honestly, had I any success in finding information I wouldn't have even posted. As much as I love this board, it is a place of last resort for me when I am seeking advanced technical information.

So, for my part in this I do apologize. Let's return to the fun part, shall we?

Even though I do have a bit of audio knowledge I would not take this gig under the circumstances you have described, even if I was doing production sound and only production sound. It is beyond my experience. (Besides, I can't stand cold weather!)

The most horrific tortures imaginable by Eli Roth and his disciples could not get me to turn down this gig. Saying no was never an option. For me this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to traverse a part of the world I never, ever thought I would be fortunate enough to visit. That I get to be there as a working cameraman, on someone else's dime, charged with tasks like "Every time you see any wildlife, grab it," is very nearly the realization of a childhood dream. It ain't Attenborough or Wild America, but it's not that far removed.

Beyond that, it is almost exactly the gig I need to have (dp, full season, minor market cable tv, #1 series on its network, for what that's worth) exactly when it needed to come along in my career path. The "extreme outdoor travel" side of it was never, strictly speaking, in the plan, but there it is.

Your client has unrealistic expectations. The job they have asked you to do is akin to asking the participants to drive their jet-skis while cooking dinner and playing the piano at the same time.

They always do. ;)

So their solution to the problems with Season 2 is to buy a dead cat? They will make zero effort and zero additions to the budget to improve the audio issues? If they don't give a damn why should you?

Are they wired or wireless? To what is their signal being directed for capture?

Wireless Sony's, brand new. I am concerned about them maintaining a solid signal over distance, and who knows what kind of problems I will run into trying to find a clean channel for them up there. It could be nothing at all, or it could be a garbled mess of global communications frequencies. That is the sort of thing you guys would know.

Prior season I think if they did have a lav going, it was some really uber cheap nonsense one. I should probably nut up and ask him to get a dedicated recorder of some kind, but their plan was to use one of the XF-100/105's for that since they have XLR ins.

The dead cat thing was just meant to humorously illustrate how little they had to work with on s1 and s2. I think the overwhelming majority of what sound they got was from little VMPs and the like. Especially while on the skis. Still, there were also - according to editor - not too much consideration given to technique even when doing a sit-down interview where there would definitely have been time to get it right. He told me some horror stories - stand-ups right next to a busy trucking route with tractor-trailers barreling past them, just to offer up the worst example. That sort of thing I know I can improve upon. ;)

Sorry I could not post a concise list of what gear is in play. The gear is staged 90 minutes away from me and the brief inventories I scribbled stayed with the gear. Okay, that was my third mistake in trying to post this thread. Ha!

You want to acquire the skills, knowledge and experience of a 20 year production sound professional in less than 24 hours, and you still won't have the equipment to do the job correctly.

Actually, no, I don't. If I had my way I would have spent my Sunday afternoon finding a sound person at the last minute. I want to acquire the skills, knowledge, and experience of a 20 year cinematography professional. I have a long way to go.

All I was hoping for here was that perhaps someone had done similar conditions and could offer up a couple of things they wished they had known before hand. I realize now that certain levels of knowledge are just not shared with strangers - or so it seems. I posted a similar question to a cinematography centric community (more about working in the environment in general, not audio related at all) and that thread stands at 0 replies to date.

So, in that respect I will have to rely on what cold conditions experience I have and apply that as best I can in the context of a working production. I've shot in the snow before, so not entirely new. Just never in true Arctic conditions, and never on an expedition this long.

And how much attention will you be able to pay to the sound while holding onto the camera in one hand and holding onto a jet-ski for your life with the other hand? APE had a lot of good suggestions - capturing ambient sounds and specific sounds to build a library - but I will make the prediction that your client probably will not allow you the time to do so, even if you have the gear to do it at all.

That right there, that's why the first words out of my mouth were "Is there a sound person?" Seriously, that was the first thing I asked to my buddy who called me up to ask if I was available and interested.

The wild sound library is hands down the best note so far. I'm definitely going to try to collect what I can to help them out in post.

I'm sorry to be so negative, but I deal with this all the time, and the annoyance factor grows with every single occurrence. I've just had a week of "Why is your bill so high?" The answer he gets is "Because you didn't hire a qualified production sound crew like I told you to in the first place!" "But he wanted $150 a day!" " That's cheaper than what you (haven't yet) paid me to clean it up, isn't it?"

Moron.

Last Friday I had a guy complaining that I couldn't fix the sound of a wide shot - which was captured using the DSLR mic from 40 feet. I referred him to a buddy of mine, who told him that he could make the audio understandable, but it would not be "broadcast quality" - and it would take a minimum of 20 hours at $385 per hour. (The only reason it was at all possible to make the audio understandable is that the two people are indoors and are screaming at each other.)

I feel your pain. Every time someone asks me for a half day on a 6 hour shoot that is a 2-3 hour round trip commute for me, I die a little inside. The sad truth is that as the landscape of the industry changes its just going to get worse. Jobs are consolidating, especially on the production side. I suspect that, outside of a narrative feature or decently budgeted TV series, 1 man -> many hats may be my foreseeable future.

That second example right there, I suspect, is the type of thing they dealt with in the first couple of seasons. It's also something I would never do. ;)

Nobody wants to pay for anything anymore. Whole host of reasons for that.

So, my apologies. Do the best you can with what you have, whatever it is.

Good Luck!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you, and don't sweat it. I am sorry about over-reacting. While I may think that you guys could ease up on folks a bit around here when the topic comes up (Stickies would help ... a lot), I also recognize that I'm pretty stressed out and twitchy at the moment which is clouding my perception.

Fortunately, the editor understands the reality of the situation - we're never going to get ideal sound with our current parameters. The show's creator and other producers perhaps not so much. I am confident I can improve upon what they had before, it's just a matter of improving upon it enough so that the show doesn't suffer and the bosses are appeased.

My Fourth Mistake on this thread: I should have used "acceptable" or "savable" in the title instead of "solid."
 
Last edited:
I fully realise that the answers/advice I give are often frustrating to those who receive it.

The reason my answers are frustrating is not because I lack experience or am unwilling to share it. It's precisely because I know something about sound that my answers are frustrating! All the equipment we use for sound is based on science, the problem is that there are so many variables and just a small variation in one of those variables can make a big difference, it can also make no perceivable difference whatsoever. It's impossible to fully describe all these variables in any particular situation and even if it were, it wouldn't be possible to predict how they will all interact and therefore it's not possible to provide any solutions beyond the most basic of generalisations. In other words, even though it's all based on science, in practise it's an art and I have to be there to apply my experience. For example, it might be that changing the mic position by 1 inch will make all the difference but it could just as easily be that moving the mic by 1 foot has a negligible effect. It would depend on the mic, the environmental conditions and the sound source. Furthermore, each of these items isn't an individual variable but a whole group containing various sub-sets of variables!

Back on topic; I have to say, the producer/s appear to be complete idiots. A difficult, dangerous and epic series of voyages, shot in 1080 is prime material for numerous national and international TV networks and could potentially have made millions, at a very long shot even into the 8 figures but instead, due to ignorance/stupidity, they have limited their potential market to cheap regional cable channels. For a relatively tiny investment in a professional PSM, the potential returns are truly huge. Not hiring a pro PSM demonstrates extreme ignorance of the business and/or madness! In other words, this might appear to be a dream gig but as you'll be dealing with this ignorance/madness in potentially dangerous situations, keep your wits about you!!!!

Good luck!

G
 
Could you hide the mic behind their sunglasses and wire it down the arms of the glasses? That should provide a little bit of protection perhaps, but still keep it closish to their faces.

Just a thought.

CraigL
 
Update from the road: I have a designated assistant among the fuel boat crew that no one mention. <_<

That gives me a great deal more capacity to focus on getting the best we can get.

Ironically, I also learnedthat the season 1 audio with only their handycams was easier for post sound than the mess that was turned in for season 2. Technique and care were, apparently absent despite having a little more gear. Before that they were more careful to do all their dialog up close and where it was quiet.

This time I am confident that I can improve on that with better than nothing sound kit and an assistant to train on the fly. Still miles from ideal, but also already miles from yesterday.

Lots of producers are idiots, and the show creator and I are the first to agree with you that a pro hire is the right way. We just can't have one yet without risking the tone/arc of the show. The sad fact is that with more outside funding comes loss of creative control to even bigger idiots who want to make standard fare fake reality bullshit like Honey Boo Boo. We're not even close to being about that.

My frustration at the initial response has nothing to do with anything you wrote in the paragraph addressing it, but at this point further discussion on that part of the thread is a waste of everyone's time. I was never expecting the kind of information you both assumed and just hoped that if either of you had anything you could share that you would help a brother out. A simple no would have been better than what transspired and the rest of us could brainstorm and experiment.

Look, I'm sorry I asked. Forget it. If we can't talk shop without letting the beef die and without me needing to repeat over and over that I would rather they hired someone then maybe a mod should just close this thread and let it die.

I'm sorry for bothering either of you with a directed question. It won't happen again.
 
Last edited:
Hey! David! You should hire a professional sound guy, preferably with 20+yrs experience, to go toodling around the arctic for a few freezing months! :lol:

Stressed much? :D
 
I'm sorry for bothering either of you with a directed question. It won't happen again.

You didn't bother me, you asked a question and I and Alcove answered it as well as we could with the info provided. I don't see why you would not want to ask directed questions in the future?! If possible I and/or Alcove will give you a precise answer/solution/advice but you should be prepared for a generalistic answer when a precise answer is not possible. If you don't want to ask questions because you have a phobia about possibly receiving a generalistic answer then fair enough but otherwise why wouldn't you?

...the show creator and I are the first to agree with you that a pro hire is the right way. We just can't have one yet without risking the tone/arc of the show. The sad fact is that with more outside funding comes loss of creative control to even bigger idiots who want to make standard fare fake reality bullshit like Honey Boo Boo.

This is what I find particularly absurd about this situation. In my experience, producers act as a kind of business reality check and will often curb or change creative ideas but, always in the name of producing a more saleable product with the available budget. What appears to be happening in this case though is the exact opposite! I'm certainly not advocating turning the expedition into "fake reality bullshit" but at least the makers of reality shows (fake or not) know to hire professional production sound teams so at least they end up with something (even if it is "bullshit"!) which can be sold to the networks. This show is based on a huge concept/adventure why would anyone (let alone the producer for god's sake!) want to make it unsellable to the main/big clients? What a terrible waste, it's completely absurd! Oh well, no one ever said that the film/TV industry was only populated with sane people! :)

G
 
I'll make a few comments and then let it rest.

I have no choice but to be general rather than specific. In order to give specific advice I need copious, boring specific details. Besides the posts I answer here on IndieTalk I'm on a number of other forums, and I get about a dozens personal emails a week. I do not give answers in the emails until they pay my consultation fee.

The producers don't want to relinquish control. That's fine. Have they done any crowd funding? The whole thing just strikes me more as a vanity project than a serious attempt at salable broadcast quality product.

The most horrific tortures imaginable by Eli Roth and his disciples could not get me to turn down this gig. Saying no was never an option.

Well, you're a visuals guy, not an audio guy. As an audio guy I would give a definitive and final "No" under the stated terms and conditions. No matter how much you protest to the contrary, audio is secondary to you - and that's okay; I could give a rodents anal sphincter about visuals before I add my sonic magic to them.

Once again, Good Luck!!!!
 
Ape,

The content of the actual answers was never the problem in the first place. The dismissive and insulting tone was. To be fair, it was never your posts that bothered me, but for some reason we are the ones discussing it. As verbose as I am it's surprising that I have been unable to make that clear. Like I said, telling me the only real answer is something I cannot have on set is functionally useless. Especially since already know that the best way is to hire someone.

But like I said, it doesn't matter. Clearly I made a mistake in caring enough about the job I have been hired to do that I dared to ask for help. I also don't really see the value in this conversation. Why am I still explaining to you my admitted over reaction? Why would I ask another audio question here if the result? General answers are great, assuming they are actually answers, "hire someone dummy" isn't an answer. If I could have done that this thread would not exist.

And Alcove, you are 100% wrong about me. I care about the quality of every craft on my set and always try to give my fellow crew what they need to do their job. If that means making accommodations in the shot fir the boom guy, I'll make them as best I can the majority of the time. Sometimes we have to compromise, sometimes changes cannot be made. I do what I can because unless everything works in concert, the whole will suffer. Just because I work one craft doesn't mean I cannot understand the importance of the others. But I sure as hell not going to turn down an excellent gig just because gear and crew are sub optimal.
 
Last edited:
David

I'm new here but all these folks and you have helped me with queries I had. I hugely appreciate that.

Alcove's first reply was brief and straight-to-the-point but given the little info regarding the audio gear you originally gave, I don't see what else he could have written.

Your first post gave no audio info. I also read the thread you referenced (which I had read before) - I didn't see any info or detail regarding the audio gear there.

You gave detail regarding the gear a post or two in.

For the audio pros, your project is yet another example of the audio being lowly rated and little understood (not by you, by your producer) - at least from a budget perspective. For any audio pro that must hurt and they have to deal with such issues (insults?) on a weekly if not daily basis. Alcove even gave some example of the bad week he is having due to these issues.

Your assignment is great and I am very envious of it - you've done great landing it. It's the assignment of a life time. I would love to be there. But for an audio pro, it's a near impossible assignment to succeed in given the low budget audio gear and immensely challenging environment (surely the most challenging for any audio pro?).

Yet you've been tasked with this, and the visuals etc. I presume the visuals are key and audio is much less important (?) - hence the budget restrictions.

For any professional, it's bad form to send them on a tough assignment with gear that is not appropriate to the task. And they're asking you to be an audio pro when you're not. That's a bit of a sucker punch (not by you) to the audio guys - it's as if your producer said 'hey audio's easy - here's basic gear, we know you can get it sorted' - whereas the reality is that you're trying to capture audio in probably the most challenging environments without the best gear or 20+ years pro audio experience.

Given that I think you presented the audio gurus a near impossible question to answer - apart from hire the best audio crew possible and get the best gear. But you care about filming and all aspects of it so you asked for help here. I respect that fully - I'm just sorry the answers were not what you wanted and the tone etc upset you. I'm sure no one intended that in any way.

It would be terrible if you felt you could not ask questions again here, or became less invovled with the IT community.

You've got one hell of an assignment - the things you are going to see and do, wow - simply amazing. I'm sure you'll do a damn great job and I'll be following by the Dangerous Waters links and hopefully your updates on IT too. The visuals are going to be amazing. For the audio, I'm sure you're going to do the best you can.

I'll be glued to Dangerous Waters - am very jealous.

And get your producer to put you in contact with the person who captured the audio on the previous season - hopefully they'll be able to give you some great advice.
 
Last edited:
And Alcove, you are 100% wrong about me. I care about the quality of every craft on my set and always try to give my fellow crew what they need to do their job.

I didn't say you didn't care about audio. Your focus - pardon the pun - is that you're a visuals guy. If your specialty was audio you wouldn't be asking the questions. I didn't notice any posts about cameras from you, so I assume that you've got the visuals thing locked down. My point was that a very large percentage of audio folks would not take the job given the extreme limitations and low budget. I've been assuming that the challenge of the gig as a DP/Cinematographer appeals to you, and you're willing to take on the audio side to get the gig.
 
Back
Top