If you were just starting out, had no glass, no SDI card in your machine, no thunderbolt port, no color-grading experience, and no support gear-- but you could leverage $3000 for a camera-- what would you get?
Seconded.... hold on to the rest of the money until you have some experience shooting and editing and are better equipped to decide which camera is best suited to your needs, goals and work styles.
Starting out doing what specifically?
If you have no experience at all, and you're not currently enrolled or about to enter film school, my instinct would be to say go for the XF100.
Blackmagic would need Lenses and SSD drives. Could run into majr bucks there. The XF100 is ready to go with some CF cards
I'd go with the XF100. The BMDCC you'll have to grade absolutely everything you ever shoot. Plus, you'd need to get SSDs, lenses, you'll probably want to get an EVF and some sort of handheld rig if you plan on going handheld... XF100 runs off CFs which are cheaper and easier to wrangle, still provides you with 4:2:2 colour data, provides balanced XLRs rather than just 1/4" TRS and is more suited to someone who is 'just starting out'. It's more likely to help you get good images, whereas the BMDCC you'll really need to know cinematography to get good images.
Is there a particular reason you've chosen to get the DR40 for audio? There's certainly times where having a separate recorder can be convenient (if you have someone else to operate it) but it's not really as necessary with the XF100 as it would be with something like a DSLR, and it'll add extra time in post to sync things up. Personally I'd skip it and put the money towards getting a better tripod - $280 for a tripod & head is certainly workable, but as you move into the $4-500 range you're going to get something that works noticeably better.
As far as tripod, on the cheaper end I'd personally go with a Manfrotto 504head and sticks though that's possibly a little expensive still. Maybe go for the 501 head and two-stage sticks.
Is there a particular reason you've chosen to get the DR40 for audio? There's certainly times where having a separate recorder can be convenient (if you have someone else to operate it) but it's not really as necessary with the XF100 as it would be with something like a DSLR, and it'll add extra time in post to sync things up. Personally I'd skip it.
Alcove Audio said:As a sound guy I advocate using an separate external audio recorder. If your budget doesn't run that way, you do what you need to do.
Yeah, th 504 is not cheap if you were originally dropping $280![]()
I've never used the Sachtler Ace but have used much more expensive Sacthelrs and they are very nice, so I imagine the build quality would still be very high. The 504 is also quite good, so again I'm sure the 502 isn't that much of a step down. It all really depends on your budget. If you can afford to go for the more expensive tripod, then it's going to be a better tripod; if you can't quite afford the extra $215, you're not going to get a necessarily bad tripod. It just won't be as good as a more expensive one (as is to be expected).