I'm an aspiring film director and I want to know more some of your processes. I have a few questions that I would love for anybody out there to answer about the world of film-making.
1)What experience do you have with film-making?
2)What exactly is the job of a director?
3)Is "film school" necessary or even worth the time and money?
4)Is creating a film stressful?
5)If it is, is it rewarding as well?
6)Is financing an independent movie a difficult process?
7)How do you conceptualize your projects? Do you write the script yourself, then go to story boarding and planning, then filming?

What's an average day of shooting like?
9)How many people (not including actors) are you working with on a film? How do you find these people?
10)What's it like working with actors? Is it hard to describe to them exactly what you have planned out in your head?
11)How much of what you have planned out in your head usually makes it to the final cut?
12)Do you enter film festivals? Have you ever won any awards at one?
13)Do you do your own editing? What software do you use?
14)Be truthful: Are you in this for the potential of fame and glory, or for the passion of your art?
I'd appreciate it if you can answer any or all of my questions. I really just want to know what steps I can make to becoming a director myself.
Thanks everybody!
1. Worked mostly on music videos and commercial work, worked on a couple of short film projects.
2. The job description varies a little depending on where your production is at (i.e. indie or blockbuster, and what degree of each, it's a spectrum) but the general description of a director is the one who has the whole movie in his head, and has to use whatever talent and tools he has at his disposal to put it on a screen, his job is to tell a story in the most creative and original way possible. He leads a big or small team of crew and cast from various fields to one cohesive effort in trying to achieve a common goal. If you are a more independent director your job extends to doing camerawork or editing, maybe more. If you are a blockbuster direcor you have plenty of assistant, each having their own assistants, and so forth. Blockbuster productions have departmental infrastructure to handle every aspect of production and it takes the worry a little out of the director's mind, but also puts a lot more responsibility. You have to gauge what level you're at and act accordingly.
3. I'm in film school right now at York University in Toronto and I could give you a pretty good argument for either side. The truth is it's not a universal truth whether school is necessary for all, it's more of a person by person case. In today's world it is not as necessary to go to school to learn a craft that's exclusively available through an institution, you can learn most of the techniques and knowledge on-line, and the gear you need is becoming increasingly cheap. Why you should go to a film school is to network, to get a degree behind your name, and to learn the more artistic side of film. I would highly recommend that if you go to a film school it's one which focuses on the art and craft of film, and while it should have a hefty amount of practice so you learn the production workflow, you need to learn how to make a movie flow and how to captivate your audience, not just use a DSLR to have a shallow depth of field. Take what you will from that.
4. It can be, it usually is, but it's a good stress. If you can't handle stress and the pressure of a group of people looking to you for answers all at once, you should get out of the director's chair. In my opinion the profession of a director is a very noble one but a very hard one. You need to know the answer to everything your crew and cast will ask without hesitation. You will get better with time at this, and are not expected to master everything in the beginning, but that's the goal.
5. It is extremely rewarding to know that you orchestrated the film you watch when you're screening it.
6. It's becoming more easy with things like indiegogo and kickstarter websites which help you fund a project but it's by no means easy. Good news is that equipment and the things you need to make a really good movie are becoming cheaper and their quality becoming better every few months, so while making a blockbuster is still very expensive and difficult to fund, making a good indie is not that hard.
7. I write myself but I also have other people write scripts which we then revise together so we both agree on things like character development and plotlines.
8. As the previous poster said, there is no average day. I'm still on the very low end of indie film production, which means there are days where I will have to shoot things myself, and then there are days where I can sit back and let my DP shoot things, while my art director tells him how it needs to be framed. There are also varying difficulties of shoots. Sometimes you will go continuously for 14 hours in blaring heat or freezing winds, and sometimes it will be a quick 4-5 hour shoot in comfortable weather with grip that's very easy to use. It's never a dull day...
9. This also depends on the scale and budget of the production. The more known you are the easier it is to wrangle crew and cast, so start building a portfolio and letting people know what you can do. The more people you have the more your directorial qualities are put to the test, you need to be confident in directing these people to do what they're there for, while still keeping in mind they may not be getting paid and may be some of your friends who are doing you a favour. My ideal crew is: 1 DP, 1 Art Director, 1 Cameraman (not mandatory though), 3-4 grips/production assistants to help set up equipment and tear down, 1 Slater, 1-2 boom operators, 1 make-up artist, 1 production coordinator to help with forms and whatnot, and sometimes the screenwriter if it's not yourself. I'd also reccomend having the editor and visual effects person on set if it's not yourself since they might have important imput.
10. It can be difficult at times working with actors but you need to understand the process they go through. Don't be too harsh and expect a lot from them or they won't work with you again/leave your production mid-way. Though you might need to treat the actors with special care and let them have their diva moments, I guarantee you it is for good reason. They need to be left alone/with other actors and the crew and their friends CANNOT bother them during production. This a craft that requires a lot of concentration and focus, in order to get YOUR image across, if anything disturbs this it will lessen their ability to perform.
There is a DISTINCT difference between people with drama training and people who are just doing it for fun and are your friends. Even a class or two of high school drama makes the world of a difference for these people, so when you cast, a little experience goes a long way. The more experience, the better actors take directions, the easier it is to convey your idea, and the more they will know what's expected of them on a shoot. Your friends won't understand what you mean and will not understand why they're there for so many hours, actors will understand the gruelling production schedule and will be able to capture your image with very minimal direction (though obviously the more you give the better). I disagree with the previous poster, I think if they have some experience it's really easy to get your idea across, but it is a tricky thing because this is a skill you pick up as a director and one they pick up as an actor with experience.
11. Any director will tell you, very little of what you plan ends up working the way you hoped. The goal is to make it as close as possible, and have as few shots as possible not work. Sometimes you will be surprised and find unplanned or accidental shots work better than what you intended.
12. I haven't entered anything yet.
13. I do my own editing and for the most part visual effects, I use Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects. I've worked at TV stations that use Avid and didn't really like it but it is an alternative. Right now Final Cut is not really considered an industry standard anymore.
14. I'm in this because I'm an avid fan of film and I want to make what I see in my head. I don't believe in the starving artist philosophy (that which says because you don't accept money or are poor you make better art), I think selling out is a great thing so long as you don't let it impose rules on your creativity. I don't care to be famous but I do hope I end up being rich one day, only because having money gives you creative freedoms that are much much more difficult to achieve at an independent level. The more film credibility you have, the more production value you can add, the easier it is to swingle together a movie and the easier it is to let your ideas flow.
www.tedmihu.net