• Wondering which camera, gear, computer, or software to buy? Ask in our Gear Guide.

One Man Short - 1st Draft

Boy. A little inspiration goes a long way. Based on conversations in another thread, I wrote this up two nights ago. Spent last night playing with Celtx, but I'm not quite there yet. So, I did my best in Word and PDF'd it. It is 8 pages total.

This is my first screenplay. I would likely shoot this as a first project, since there is little outdoor work required. We're currently weather-challenged here.

Comments are appreciated, particularly on building up to the ending. Seems a bit weak yet.

Click for the file (PDF).

Cheers... Don
 
Just a first impression from browsing... too much continous monologue. You need to break it up with some action, or even parentheticals. If the guy is just going to stand there, looking into the camera.. it's too boring to watch, and nobody will listen to him. At least when it's a whole minute of talking, 5 times.

I'm not saying that the content is boring, but if you're listening to someone talking and talking and talking, you'll be bored too, no matter what he's saying. You'd need a heck of a good actor to make that interesting. ;)
 
Last edited:
I think your idea is quite artsy. I can see where you want to go with it, but I agree with Anti-X that it plays better in the head than it would on screen. The screen is highly visual.

Your monologues conjures up a number of images. I would use that by creating stock images with your 'dead hero' acting out those scenes to convey how he lords over your narrator. Flash between your narrator in the dark and those scenes.

It could come across very much like a "Cask of Amontillado"-like story. And as others indicate, don't underestimate the power of the audio. Start the music light and make it shift to more ominous.

If you simply film it 'flat', it will lose your audience quickly.
 
Anti-X & FantasySciFi - Thanks very much for your input.

In looking to fill this piece out a bit more, I was going to add two things at the beginning. One would be an audio-only segment, running under the intro titles, that depicts the salesman arriving, being met by the woman and some initial intimacy. The second scene would be of a car arriving at a house, implying the Man arriving home. Then cut to the start of the dialog.

FantasySciFi: "...it plays better in the head than it would on screen..." ROFL. You're very kind. Thank you.

Now, a couple of questions...

In breaking up the monologue, would you leave the audio running and just break it visually, or cut entirely to the new scene and then back to the monologue?

The cuts that I had been envisioning (in the house) were mostly still photos. They would really just flash in with enough duration to register and be gone, except for the final one where we see the woman on the floor.

Say there were 4 or 5 more cuts added to break the monologue, would that be overworking the visual impact?

Thanks... Don
 
Don,

Yeah, it makes for a meaty monologue for stage. However...

If I were taking this on as a script to direct, I would probably shoot the entire scene that transpired between the three characters and I'd bring almost ALL of "Mr. Beard's" dialog in as VOICEOVER, finding ways to include bits where he addresses the audience by talking to the camera. Maybe when he walks by a mirror he talks to himself or something like that.

I think there is a lot of potential in the edit with this one. I see some possibilities for super slow motion scenes and some abstract imagery, creating parity with Mr. Beard's philosophies.

It's definitely not a visual script as written, but while I read it a number of images came to mind. If the spoken word was voiceover, you're left with no choice but to MAKE it visual.

Just a simple shot of the camera pointed at him driving to the scene, staring blankly ahead, and hearing his thoughts...

Reminded me of Funny Games http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808279/. If you haven't seen this film (I saw the American remake version) it is worth a look.

Well, that's my take on it. I'm probably not articulating my thoughts very well, but the material has potential and could be a good jumping off point for something gritty and artful. :)
 
... In looking to fill this piece out a bit more, I was going to add two things at the beginning. One would be an audio-only segment, running under the intro titles, that depicts the salesman arriving, being met by the woman and some initial intimacy. The second scene would be of a car arriving at a house, implying the Man arriving home. Then cut to the start of the dialog.
...

I would honestly use these as flashback items in the monologues. First, you don't have to find even more material to fill in. Second, it gives an edge to the dialogue.

Now, a couple of questions...

In breaking up the monologue, would you leave the audio running and just break it visually, or cut entirely to the new scene and then back to the monologue?
A grey area here. The director normally will have his/her own cinematographic view. As a screenwriter, I try to convey what I see in my head. Obviously, the producer/director wins out when it comes to budgets. My personal preference would be to start off with the talking head then switch over to a voiceover with the scenes. Because audio clashes, if you are going to have dialogue--script it. If it's just giggling, motors running, that should be fine. Just do good sound editing so they don't compete with your voiceover.

The cuts that I had been envisioning (in the house) were mostly still photos. They would really just flash in with enough duration to register and be gone, except for the final one where we see the woman on the floor.
Film is a dynamic medium. Short cuts to static images are fine. I kind of hear a Psycho theme in my head with pieced static shots. Again, this is a cinematographic call. For me--again directorial style--I would have the last image as dynamic (blood running down the drain) and fade back to the talking head.

Say there were 4 or 5 more cuts added to break the monologue, would that be overworking the visual impact?

Thanks... Don
A lot of this is up to you since you are writing, directing, and producing. The one rule is that there are no hard and fast rules. From an aesthetic point of view, don't allow visuals and audio background to derail the dialogue and storyline. Having said that, a rough rule of thumb that I use with long dialogue is to break it up after 3-4 lines. It's not hard and fast. Unless you are filming Shakespeare, soliloquies need to have something interspersed. Often a director will change angles or depth to accent portions of the dialogue.

A spec script is really just about the story idea. A shooting script details all the shots and how this will be put on screen. These can be and often are very different beasts.
 
Back
Top