So, I'm writing my first feature length. It's a 50 minute movie where you pretty much don't know what's going on or at least you sort of think you know what's happening until the last 20 minutes. Then the twist comes in. Here's where I get nervous.
A good twist comes and goes, but this twist requires a 20 minute explanation. Should I figure out a way to shorten this or is it acceptable to have a 20 minute resolution scene where the twist is expanded on for 20 minutes. It's the most interesting 20 minutes of the movie, but still...I'm not sure if that's going to mess up the flow.
The first 10 minutes is the set-up that establishes the two stories that eventually merge at the end. The next 7 minutes is the plot point that leads to Act II. Act II is roughly 20 minutes and then the conclusion is around the same amount.
So I guess to sum it all up, is it acceptable to make your conclusion a little longer than the normal length if its really interesting and connects well to the rest of the movie or should I sacrifice some of the interesting aspects and make it shorter?
A good twist comes and goes, but this twist requires a 20 minute explanation. Should I figure out a way to shorten this or is it acceptable to have a 20 minute resolution scene where the twist is expanded on for 20 minutes. It's the most interesting 20 minutes of the movie, but still...I'm not sure if that's going to mess up the flow.
The first 10 minutes is the set-up that establishes the two stories that eventually merge at the end. The next 7 minutes is the plot point that leads to Act II. Act II is roughly 20 minutes and then the conclusion is around the same amount.
So I guess to sum it all up, is it acceptable to make your conclusion a little longer than the normal length if its really interesting and connects well to the rest of the movie or should I sacrifice some of the interesting aspects and make it shorter?