archived-videos "good to me" music video, shot HD with canon mk2

[chad boutin]

we did this whole project, songwriting and production in 48 hours... c3 and greed wayne the artists had no prep time to produce a quick reality based trailer...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSnyOTzC1Yg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=<object width="853" height="505"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OSnyOTzC1Yg&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01&hd=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OSnyOTzC1Yg&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0xe1600f&color2=0xfebd01&hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="853" height="505"></embed></object>

 

[GreatDanton]

Great - the quality looks really professional (well shot - edited and outputted)

Not much of a variety of camera angles once you actually get into the music video, the introduction was awesome though (outshone the video).

Not that it matters, but the songs sucks and i want to punch the lead singer in the face.

4/5

 

[Kosh]

I'm with GreatDanton on the quality (very nice) and the technique. How did you get the very shallow DOF - adapter or camera position (combined with lighting)? If it was the former which DOF adapter did you use? If the latter, how far was the camera from the talent? Nice work. Thanks for sharing.

 

[CDCosta]

I'm with GreatDanton on the quality (very nice) and the technique. How did you get the very shallow DOF - adapter or camera position (combined with lighting)? If it was the former which DOF adapter did you use? If the latter, how far was the camera from the talent? Nice work. Thanks for sharing.

The Canon Mark ii is a DSLR that shoots video. It looks like they used a very low F-stop, maybe a 1.8, and probably on a mid legth lens like a 70mm, which is what would give it that shallow DOF.

Unfortunately its not very interesting, and the song isnt very good.