Filmmaking Knowledge

Let me first start off with a quick overview:

I am currently a college student enrolled in an Associate's program (digital video and cinema production) aimed at teaching the basics of filmmaking. So far I have been taught how to write a script, the importance of audio (what mics to use in varying circumstances, how to record proper sound, sound design, and etc. ), editing (pro tools, avid, premiere), how to use varying cameras (fs100, ex1, ex3), and amongst other things.

The problem I find myself facing, is that I am still not knowledgable of proper terminology and other seemingly basic principles involved in using a camera e.g. Nd filters, f-stops, focus peaking, ios, and the variations of all the different fps, just to name a few.

Understandably, one can easily say: "You're going to school to get a degree in filmmaking. Why haven't you learned these things yet?" To answer that question: yes I am, but the problem I'm running into is that many of my teachers throw us into the water while barely mentioning any of the above terms or features. And if they do, its just to passingly give us a shallow explanation about them. Arguably, many of these things are INDEED the basic principles to filmmaking and they're things we should know already to some degree. Although I am familiar with them, I feel as though I'm not that well versed.

I have even taken measures to acquire additional knowledge on these features and industry jargon (** I have signed up for classes on cinematography and even done some of my own research. I even plan on becoming familiar with basic camera functions by purchasing my own personal camera**) But unfortunately, I still feel like I'm coming up short esp. when pitted with people in my degree program who are much more knowledgable than me in those areas.

At this point, I feel as if I'm behind the curve from my lack of know-how and at the very least feel overwhelmed from constantly trying to make up for lost time esp. when taking into consideration I'm nearly done with my degree.

I'm wondering is there a way to educate myself on these principles where my teachers have otherwise failed such as a very informational book, go-to encyclopedia or something to that effect :) Other suggestions are welcomed as well.
 
Do you want to be a Cinematographer?

The greatest misconception is that someone who wants work in film must be knowledgable either about every craft there is; or at the very least about cameras.

I've know many directors who know very little about camera technology or how it works. They do, however, have a clear vision of what they want, and how they want something to look - that's why they hire me.
 
Yeah, I feel bad for you. I wonder why they wouldn't cover that stuff more for you. On the other hand, just speculating, could it be that they didn't want their students to get "caught up on" all that stuff? Dunno.

What Jax said ^.

Other than that. Yes, there is plenty you can do to educate yourself. YouTube really has become an incredible resource for disseminating and finding knowledge. Nowadays, when I want to learn how to do something, I usually check to see if people have video tutorials on YouTube. Some are experts. Some not so much. But you can often find something helpful.

Examples:

These are oriented more towards still photography. But they do address some of those basics. Of course, as you know, shutter speed is pretty much decided for you and "set" when shooting video, so you don't have to worry about that one.

Here's an example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wsBrkD_Hfo

And there are many others.

But you don't need the internet. There are those old fashioned, beautiful books. My favorite book on photography is this very simple, understandable (even for me), and affordable book on the very basics:

Basic 35mm Photo Guide: For Beginning Photographers

Yeah, it's not about video, and it hails from the days of film. But its excellent coverage of the very basics of photography is as relevant as ever.

And there are plenty more to choose from.
 
Last edited:
So far I have been taught ... the importance of audio (what mics to use in varying circumstances, how to record proper sound, sound design, and etc. ), editing (pro tools ...

No, you really haven't!! Chances are, you barely know what sound design is, let alone what a Sound Designer does or how they do it. Likewise, chances are that you know a few editing basics in ProTools but probably none of the basics or terminology of field recorder workflows, frame-edge sync, stem workflows, integrated loudness and a whole host of other basics.

I'm not being facetious or insulting, I'm trying to point out the reality of the situation. There is a huge vocabulary/set of terminology for audio, plus Sound Designers spend a few years at uni just on a general audio course, then several more interning/assisting in each of the specialist areas (Foley, SFX, ADR, Dialogue and Re-Recording) before accumulating enough knowledge to be a Sound Designer, if they're lucky, maybe within 10 years of starting. In other words, even a uni course dedicated purely to audio is only going to be able to cram in generalities and a fraction of the audio terminology and your degree course isn't specifically just audio but tries to cram in a number of disparate filmmaking areas/crafts. For example, if you aspire to anything beyond no budget amateur filmmaking, you going to have to know a bit about accounting/financing and legal issues, more filmmaking areas with huge vocabularies and terminology, the surface of which can barely even be scratched in a general filmmaking course!

In other words, I'm not sure it's fair to say your teachers "have failed". The nature and duration of the course means that they have to simplify to such a degree that it's largely about prioritising which basics can even be mentioned, let alone explored/practised, even superficially. It maybe that the priorities decided upon do not match your personal filmmaking priorities and it's also very possible that you don't yet know enough about filmmaking to fully understand why the course designer/s have chosen those particular priorities. It's also possible that the course hasn't been designed or run well but that is just one of several possibilities, maybe what you expect from the course is not realistic? A course of this type cannot be more than an introduction to some of the general filmmaking areas, if you want more you're going to have to do it yourself, enrol in more specialised courses and/or gain practical experience by interning, running, etc.

G
 
Last edited:
Do you want to be a Cinematographer?

The greatest misconception is that someone who wants work in film must be knowledgable either about every craft there is; or at the very least about cameras.

I've know many directors who know very little about camera technology or how it works. They do, however, have a clear vision of what they want, and how they want something to look - that's why they hire me.

I don't aim to make a career out of being a Cinematographer; overall my goal is to become a Director. But as you know, you don't just start from the beginning being one. You have to work your way up and seeing as how more than likely I will start my career on the independent film scene, personally I feel I should understand these basic understandings esp. in the event if something were to go wrong on set.

I'm not being facetious or insulting, I'm trying to point out the reality of the situation. There is a huge vocabulary/set of terminology for audio, plus Sound Designers spend a few years at uni just on a general audio course, then several more interning/assisting in each of the specialist areas (Foley, SFX, ADR, Dialogue and Re-Recording) before accumulating enough knowledge to be a Sound Designer, if they're lucky, maybe within 10 years of starting. In other words, even a uni course dedicated purely to audio is only going to be able to cram in generalities and a fraction of the audio terminology and your degree course isn't specifically just audio but tries to cram in a number of disparate filmmaking areas/crafts. For example, if you aspire to anything beyond no budget amateur filmmaking, you going to have to know a bit about accounting/financing and legal issues, more filmmaking areas with huge vocabularies and terminology, the surface of which can barely even be scratched in a general filmmaking course!

I admire your post for its honesty. I am well aware of how generalized my courses are and understand that several of the different fields they glaze over cannot be tackled in an in-depth manner. I myself have acknowledged my own shortcomings and recognize that I will have to do additional research and studying in my own time if I am to learn any of the specifics involved esp. if I am serious in obtaining a career in such a field.

I will admit it is unfair of me to say my teachers have "failed" me to some degree, this statement is mainly a result of frustration from my lack of knowledge. With that being said however, instead of solely putting the blame on my teachers I understand I need to seek out information and guides on my own to compensate for my own lack of understanding. This was my reasoning behind seeking out any suggestions or recommendations for learning the basics before I even tackle such crafts.


Thank you richy for the suggestion!
 
Last edited:
I myself have acknowledged my own shortcomings and recognize that I will have to do additional research and studying in my own time if I am to learn any of the specifics involved ...

To be honest, I don't just think you're being unfair to your teachers, I think you're being unrealistic and unfair on yourself! Not knowing all or even the majority of terms/vocabulary used throughout filmmaking is a shortcoming but it's a shortcomming shared by all Directors. I'm not even sure it's possible for one person to learn all the vocabulary/terminology used in all the filmmaking fields! Maybe if one were to dedicate one's entire life just to learning vocabulary/terminology rather than actually making films it would be possible? I've worked with many directors with decades of professional experience and I've yet to come across one with an indepth understanding of audio terminology. This obviously results on occasion in directors using inappropriate terms, which does cause confusion and mis-communication but it's also my job to interpret a director's wishes, appreciating that it's simply not possible for a director to have the same level of command of audio terms that I have. It's a two way street, it's the director's job to direct me and my job to understand and implement that direction.

It can certainly be useful to study glossaries of terms but it can also be harmful. Some/many terms may have nuances not explained in glossaries and the precise meaning of some terms can change and evolve over time, "Sound Design" is a classic example! While it's worth spending some time studying terminology, I wouldn't fixate over it too much. Far better to get out there interning/assisting/running on commercial sets and/or in pre/post and experiencing the professional use of the terminology first hand!

G
 
Last edited:
It is odd graduates come out without knowing an apple box from an Apple mac. Knowing lots of basics is really important depending on what you are doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arGzXbxkTC4

Seriously speaking, if you are building a career, my opinion (which could be wrong) is that today, not having technicals will close doors.

Take for example, a 40+ friend of mine. Lovely guy but he is properly old school and back in the day he would just communicate what he wanted and the camera dept etc... would just do what he was expressing. However, he made some bad choices and in order to re-start his career, he created a production company, shot a $20k USD short etc...

The reason his comeback has been unsuccessful is because for a start, he ends up losing customers because he is twice the cost of more flexible, technically-aware individuals, has wasted a ton of money on stuff he didn't need and his lack of technical workflow scr@ws him financially throughout the production process.

He is living off his reputation but clients ignore him as they receive cheaper, better pitches from more technically astute film makers.

So I think good fundamental technicals are important depending on the film making route you are taking. Sure, if you are taking the traditional route from 20 years ago where you start off as a runner and end up as a director, then no problem at all and you can pick this stuff up as you go along. However, not having the fundamental technicals will close career opportunities in today's market.

And incidentally, this director has now found a job teaching in film school. He is teaching that an understanding of technicals is completely unnecessary for a director.
 
Back
Top