archived-videos Cheerios and Rainbows

The story is bad.
Everything else is fine.

Camera work is well above average. Some of the docu-cam (which I like just fine) becomes shakey-cam (which I do not). The focus, lighting, blocking, blah blah blah are all fine.

Audio is fine.

Acting - for the material given to them - is fine.

Editing is fine.

But the story didn't make a lick of sense in a not-engaging way.
 
rayw said:
The story is bad.
Everything else is fine.

Camera work is well above average. Some of the docu-cam (which I like just fine) becomes shakey-cam (which I do not). The focus, lighting, blocking, blah blah blah are all fine.

Audio is fine.

Acting - for the material given to them - is fine.

Editing is fine.

But the story didn't make a lick of sense in a not-engaging way.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the comment :) The "story," as it were, is really more of a social satire on maturity (or lack there-of) and silly high schoolers. It's purposefully all over the place as perhaps a bit of an exaggeration on the average high schooler. I guess that is to say, it's not supposed to have a specific narrative...but is rather supposed to be just a snippet of a day in high school. Of course the Cheerio and Reading Rainbow thing was the thing exception to everything I just said :P

I do kind of see where you're coming from though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top