Hi guys, what's going is that in A COUPLE of days I will have a shoot as follows:
Premise:
One actor doing his thing in front of a green screen that is placed outside, in a garden.
This footage is to be taken and replaced on the face of a building, as if I can see him, through the window, doing his thing in one of the apartments in that building.
In the final scene, the timing is night-time, so imagine seeing inside apartments at night, that's the result we're looking for in terms of lighting and composition. Also a good idea to keep in mind that..on a 1920x1080 picture, the actors would fill up ~100pixels in height, so it's an extreme wide shot in that sense.
Possible pull-offs:
1 - We actually shoot the green screen at night, lit as best as possible by myself, not having much experience to improve the set lighting, but having an understanding of what I need to get the good results for that green screen. (don't forget, green screen is placed outside, we do this in the garden for space). This pull-off gives me the advantage of actual artificial light to simulate the apartment, but the disadvantage of messing it up entirely as I can't know all the variables in advance, and there isn't time to test things out and see how they turn out to work, and the advantages I am mentioning are only advantages I presume and believe to be following reason (questionable reason that is).
and 2 - We shoot the green screen towards sunset, in non-direct sunlight, we get much more even lighting for better results in keying and the advantage of not needing lights at all in the end. The problem with this one is that I don't know how this would grade for the needs of the final scene, making the actors look like they are lit by the lighting in an apartment, whereas the original footage is (indirectly, in the shadow) sunlit.
I hope I could make you get the picture right, as I need to know what you guys advise me to do? 1 or 2?
Premise:
One actor doing his thing in front of a green screen that is placed outside, in a garden.
This footage is to be taken and replaced on the face of a building, as if I can see him, through the window, doing his thing in one of the apartments in that building.
In the final scene, the timing is night-time, so imagine seeing inside apartments at night, that's the result we're looking for in terms of lighting and composition. Also a good idea to keep in mind that..on a 1920x1080 picture, the actors would fill up ~100pixels in height, so it's an extreme wide shot in that sense.
Possible pull-offs:
1 - We actually shoot the green screen at night, lit as best as possible by myself, not having much experience to improve the set lighting, but having an understanding of what I need to get the good results for that green screen. (don't forget, green screen is placed outside, we do this in the garden for space). This pull-off gives me the advantage of actual artificial light to simulate the apartment, but the disadvantage of messing it up entirely as I can't know all the variables in advance, and there isn't time to test things out and see how they turn out to work, and the advantages I am mentioning are only advantages I presume and believe to be following reason (questionable reason that is).
and 2 - We shoot the green screen towards sunset, in non-direct sunlight, we get much more even lighting for better results in keying and the advantage of not needing lights at all in the end. The problem with this one is that I don't know how this would grade for the needs of the final scene, making the actors look like they are lit by the lighting in an apartment, whereas the original footage is (indirectly, in the shadow) sunlit.
I hope I could make you get the picture right, as I need to know what you guys advise me to do? 1 or 2?
Last edited: