Search results

OK, maybe Im on the wrong side of the camera then;) Thanks for your opinions guys...

Basically what you are saying is "Its your fault no matter what the circumstances were and don't argue with the production company over it regardless of who might be right from a legal standpoint cause you will loose future job opportunities and this is how it normally works and there's nothing...

WHERE exactly did at say that???? Yes, I understand this is your advice since you said it three times now even though its not what I asked for.

Cause it's their project and they were the producers and they choose to hired me to use their equipment. If they think I did such a bad job loosing a lens cap, they can choose simply not to hire me again. Thats how it works. It was also a very stressful shoot, not enough camera assistants, lots...

I didn't hire a camera from them. They employed me and provided me a camera to work with. Big difference...

Hope this is not the wrong place to ask this. I did a shoot as a cameraman lately which involved a lot of running around with a heavy camera and somehow I lost the lens cap and now the production company wants me to take that cost off my salary. I was hired as a freelance (no written contract)...

Thanks for great answer FantasySci-Fi:)

I'm a European filmmaker who has lately been focusing on writing spec screenplays with the goal of having them bought and produced by Hollywood companies. Currently have 6 completed feature length screenplays in the Drama, Action and/or Thriller genre. I've previously had 2 of my screenplays...

I emailed them and asked if we could use the logo if we manufactured at their facilites, and the answer was "I don't see why not":) i also E-mailed a several other manufacturers and they all said it's NP if we manufacure at their place, so I guess most established manufactures got the license...

thanks. we will probably manufacture at Sony, so my understanding is that they have the license and will instruct us how to use the logo. correct me if I'm wrong

I'm not sure you are right after reading this page http://www.dvdfllc.co.jp/logo/lg_who.html from what I can read there, it's the manufacturer(replicator) (not authoring house, not distributor, not producer) of the disc who applies for the license and then instructs the distributor how to use...

We're preparing the artwork for a US distributor and we're unsure about the use of these logos on the artwork. I've been researching a lot on the internet (so please don't post any links), but it's still a little confusing. My understanding is however that it's the company who...

yes.my point exactly. It's an independent fairly low budget, so I'm quite sure I'll be putting in a lot more time as an Editor than I did as a DP...

yes but I wanted general opinions from others, before I negotiate. This is of course considering that the DP and Editor, like in my case:), has about the same experience and level of skill.

Ive newly been the DP on an independent feature and now they want me on board as the Editor as well. In my expericence the Editors salary should normally be higher that the DPs right? About the double. Am I right or not?

I have made an independent foreign film and have found a US distributor. But the film is not rated yet. Do I need it rated to be able to sell it and how much is the cost. I've been told its about USD 2500. sounds like a lot. Need advice.