Search results

I know what you mean but budget wise I'd be willing to stretch it to get it right. I'll be looking to shoot as efficiently as possible with a ratio of 1:3 and some scenes will only be done on one take. Though I'm not sure this will actually save me money in the end as it'll be extra time...

I know nothing about film tbh but wouldn't photochemical timing cost a lot more? I looked up those cameras and maybe the bolex might be within my price range. Bearing in mind my total budget will be around €15,000 and I'll be making the funds myself - so in all likelihood it'll be next year :/...

Hi all, I'm looking to shoot my first serious short film later this year. The film will be based on a true story and set in the 1970's. The thing I really want to achieve with it is to have the whole look and feel of the 70's, not just with the costuming, set and props but I want it to look...

Well technically not the only difference. It depends on which camera you're using. You're correct in saying that a 1.8 is equivalent to a 3.6 but for recording better low light conditions you'll need better glass such as voigtlander f0.95 range or speedbooster+sigma 18-35 f1.8. Or if you can...