Search results

Wow...getting a bit hot in here...

Way I tend to handle it is to upload to both. If you're linking people who are specifically looking to watch a video link them to the vimeo. Rely on your YouTube channel to push your personal brand, though.

To my eye it looks like most of the work was done by tossing on a bleach bypass and a heavy vignette, and probably a slight s-curve to the contrast. Nothing too rough. MAYBE some diffusion as well, but some shots had me second-guessing that opinion.

That doesn't strike me quite as a lens flare...trying taking a look at these, see if they're what you're looking for: http://www.optefex.com/streak-filters

This is why you should PLAN for this sort of thing, but I digress. Either try to take it out in post, reshoot, ask (beg) for official permission, or keep your fingers crossed. There's no single answer.

I typically walk onto set with a well planned and typed-out shotlist. I typically grab about 20% of the shots as they were planned, and let inspiration take control of the other 80%. What I use the shotlist for in that kind of situation is as a checklist to make sure that I have what that shot...

In your instance there you probably don't even need the parentheticals to specify that he's addressing the team unless there are a number of other characters in the scene that could confuse the direction. If Spencer and his team are the major character in that moment, then the line should be...

I'm confused...did you just make a post asking for people's opinions on a logline/synopsis and then take a negative response as incentive to proceed unchanged? ...to each their own, I guess...

In my opinion, the structure is a solid guideline, but it morphs to your format, not the other way around. Normally with a short, you'll need your act 1 to conclude within the first minute. Often this causes the inciting incident to have happened before the short begins, but if done well that...

In LA? Chances are you'll be tagged for not having a permit...you could try it, but I would recommend thinking up some back-up plans...

As with everything, it's probably best to focus on the fundamentals before jumping feet first into the most expensive software you can afford. After all, would you rather have a pro with a curves adjustment, or a novice with resolve grade your film? Here's a decent link for a bare-bones guide...

+1. Davinci is quite a powerful software, and worth acquiring. Alternately, if you decide to go RED, getting a baseline knowledge of Redcine-X isn't a bad call. However, even the stock color correction capabilities in most NLEs can get you most of the way there. Practice with levels...

Third day went brilliantly! Several delays in availability for actors, equipment, and animals put us behind a few weeks. Technical limitations are also pushing us to do one more day indoors with a greenscreen. Here's a few screen-caps: http://i.imgur.com/EYpAr.jpg http://i.imgur.com/UoYYK.jpg...

Enjoyed everything for the most part, very straightforward stuff, bump contrast, balance the shots. Nice stuff. The only thing I'd recommend would be doing a secondary on her skin and punching up in the pink a bit. She seems a bit yellow in the shots, and it looks slightly unnatural. The only...

It didn't hurt 28 days later, but they also didn't do it for the sake of being gratuitous. Gratuitous nudity is a hallmark of trash horror.

I'll PM you with it.

Hey Riley, I've written an adaptation as part of a direct-to-DVD Poe anthology. Not sure if that's the vein of what you're looking for, but if you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them.

Would've been a lot easier if you showed Woody Harrelson in the shot. It's Defendor, right?

Nailed it! Crack Shot! Good job, and bonus points for the ZZ Top (even though the video clip you grabbed doesn't appear to have the shot anywhere in it)!

Good analysis, and you're not off base with any particular thing...except the guess. Not Annie Get Your Gun. Nice guess, but not it.