Search results

I understand your analogy. Of course all of this is subjective, but to me the 5D raw has a great cinematic look. The "cinematic look" has often more to do with the color grading than with the camera.

Not anymore with the 5D shooting raw.... :)

You misspelled leefilm on your vimeo page.

Holy batman!! Just wait until Robin finds out! Wow cow poop! :woohoo: Probably because it's a great camera and has been discontinued. Ok I don't know but am curious too... I bet it's because of stuff like this. Shot on GH2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdYO3KWmcv8

The GH2 won't be challenged by the 600D/T3i in terms of image detail/resolution. But the 5D mark III is a different story, now with the hack it's as detailed as the hacked GH2 (but still more expensive...): GH2 vs 5d mark III RAW comparison: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFBc7i1Q_0w

This is the work of a genious... :)

They are focusing on the T3i right now but say that it may be possible on the T2i too. There's more dynamic range in raw... becaus it's RAW, no compression, so more color information per pixel. You can shoot 1080 RAW on the 5D mkIII because it has a high write speed (RAW files are huge...) ont...

To me the biggest advantage of the 5D is low light performance.

The best footage I've seen so far with the mark III and the new hack: http://vimeo.com/66480704

First you have to install the lastest version of magic lantern nightly builds: http://nanomad.magiclantern.fm/nightly/ Then download the latest patch and overwrite files in the magic lantern folder: https://bitbucket.org/OtherOnePercent/tragic-lantern-2.0/downloads Remember this is untested...

Yes thanks to the new Magic Lantern hack. Another test (not a fair one... du to extreme stretching of the RAW) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnZ57bIq4JA

Made a quick test comparing both formats. This was mainly done to complare the dynamic range. The flicker on the h.264 clip is caused by post processing (my mistake). What do you think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eng6lHjFS-g

...and at the moment the 5D mark 2 is capable of 1880x720... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW5QqQUC8jM

Ok now I understand. The limit is not the SD card but the actual camera recording on the 600D (max 21 Mb/s). So forget what I said on my previous post... here from the forums: "Quote from: CFP on May 13, 2013, 08:57:40 PM Could somebody with a fast SD card could give it a try? According to...

I don't know but 22 Mb/s seems to be the maximum and it's not enough... From the forums: "@Rush posted earlier in this thread regarding best settings for the 600d. Here's what he wrote: The best you can with 600D (550D/60D) is: (limited by hardware SD transfer rates) - 960х540, upscale it to...

The only thing preventing the 600D/t3i to shoot 1920x1080 24p RAW is the SD card speed. There aren't cards fast enough to handle all the data. I hope they can find a way around this but it won't be easy. Users are reporting some success shooting 960x540 RAW (many lost pink frames) and even at...

Here is a comparison between the 5D RAW and Blackmagic Cinema Camera. On the video comments you can see the author's thoughts on the test. https://vimeo.com/66170436# "What became clear is that both cameras provide very similarly capable RAW files. You can adjust everything and everything is...

Aha! Just kidding! I can't afford that kind of camera... I had to save for a year and a half to buy a Canon 600D! :yes:

A "fair" comparison will sort out the difference in sharpness between the 5D RAW and Blackmagic. Meanwhile to my eyes the sharpness of the 5D and the Blackmagic don't seem much different. I guess the Blackmagic Cine Camera will allways be sharper at least in 2.5K mode. But by now it's obvious...

I'm sure soon there will be some tests comparing the 5D RAW to the Blackmagic Cinema Camera. Here are some frame grabs from the Blackmagic CInema Camera, even being different subject/lens/light conditions... how do you think they compare overall?